

#Airbeam sensor full#
The full information on all test results are available in the full-length reports. Note that the results provided in these tables are a subset of all of the sensors and tests conducted, some results are not shown in these summary tables for sensors that had inconclusive results due to either data logging failure, reference monitor failure, or other limiting factors. To assist the user, Sensor Evaluation Tables have been created that provide selected sensor performance results from reports, which can be found on the Air Sensor Toolbox. The following air sensors have been evaluated in laboratory or field studies by EPA researchers. By assessing these data collected under the same air quality and weather conditions, researchers can compare how accurate and reliable low-cost technologies are to traditional methods. Placing the sensors near a regulation grade monitor, researchers collect data on air quality with both technologies. To help those interested in using sensors as part of air monitoring projects, EPA researchers evaluate sensors for how well they measure air pollutants and how easy they are to use. Since this technology is still under development, little information exists on the quality of data that these sensors produce.
#Airbeam sensor professional#
Regression and Precision Results for CAIRSENSE sensors (1-hour time averaged)Įmerging air quality sensors – with general traits of being more compact, directly reading pollutants, and lower in cost than traditional methods - have a wide appeal to professional researchers, community groups, students, and citizen scientists alike.

CAIRSENSE-Denver Sensor Data Completeness.Where can I get information about the air pollutants measured by these sensors?.What do the sensor terms used in these tables mean?.
